The Spirit of Jezebel & The Empire State Building

   

     Just when I think this nation can't turn any further away from YHWH, I see the disturbing image of the Hindu goddess Kali projected on the Empire State Building... and it's supposedly all in the name of art and projecting the human race's need to avoid our coming extinction.
     Here's how the subterfuge is presented:  Filmmaker Louie Psihoyos announces that he wishes to initiate an artistic presentation called Projecting Change, which projected pictures of endangered creatures onto the NYC skyline.  Meant to spark awareness of massive wildlife extinction, and to draw attention to the alarming rate at which species are dying, images such as that of the now famous Cecil the lion, and hundreds of other nameless endangered animals were showcased on the Empire State Building.
     Of course projecting images on New York City's most iconic building is bound to make a statement.  But I can think of many other causes that could have used the publicity to garner support and sympathy .... oh, say the fact that 22 of our military veterans die each day from suicide, for instance; or the innocent Christian girls in the Middle East who have been kidnapped as sex slaves for the barbarians called ISIS; or, how about the innocent fetuses sold for body parts by Planned Parenthood?
     But apparently this filmmaker felt that Mother Nature deserved the public's attention more, so he drafted artist Andrew Jones to design the last image to deface... uh, I mean appear on the Empire State Building.  It was the fierce portrait of Kali, who is the Hindu Goddess of Time, Change, Power and Destruction.  She was presented as an avatar "to fight the dangers of pollution and extinction."  In reality she was presented to the world as an idol; her name means black, time, death, lord of death; and she is known as the “Black One”, or the “Dark One”.
     I ask you, how is this any different from the other false goddesses that have turned mankind away from the worship of the true God?  In an astute 2009 blog I found a comprehensive study of the stable of "mother goddesses" who all have the same spirit of destruction and dominance.  I have written of this phenomenon across cultures in the past, but this article gives an excellent summation.  Historian César Vidal is quoted as saying, "The mother goddess received different names and external appearances, but, in substance, she was always the same. In Egypt, she was called Isis. In Crete, she was represented as a mother who made friendly contact with snakes. In Greece she was known as Demeter, and in Rome she was worshiped as Cybele, the Magna Mater (Great Mother), a mother goddess of Phrygian origin. There is practically no ancient culture that did not worship this type of deity."  So, it looks as if we just falling right in line.
     But perhaps one of the most important architects of this false worship was Jezebel, the pagan Queen of Israel.  When the Phoenician princess Jezebel married Ahab, the king of Israel, she influenced him to fully establish Baal worship in his realm.  You see, in Phoenicia, Baalism included the worship of Molech with fiery sacrifices of children and the worship of Astarte, the Phoenician Ishtar, Queen of Heaven.  Jezebel caused altars to be erected to this idol in every part of Israel; and at one time four hundred priests attended the worship of Ishtar/Ashteroth.  She had such a powerful control over Ahab, that he built a temple to Baal, and the Bible records that he sinned against God more than any other king.  But here's the result of that idolatrous relationship:  The nation of Israel became so entangled with the Queen of Heaven/Mother Goddess worship that YHWH judged them by sending them into captivity by the hand of the Assyrians, and the nation of Israel was scattered to the ends of the earth.  2 Kings 17 tells us that the Israelites turned away from worshipping God, built false idols, worshipped Ashteroth, killed their children, served Baal, practiced witchcraft, and sinned greatly against God.  For all that, "the Lord was very angry with Israel, and removed them from His sight; there was none left but the tribe of Judah alone."
     So, how are we any different?  How do you think God views the Hindu Goddess Kali being projected as worthy of worship by our nation?  Because that is what we are doing when we admire and honor her; when we pay homage to her and magnify her as worthy of our adulation?  And aren't Kali's other name descriptions reminiscent of the spirit of Jezebel?  I mean, didn't Jezebel bring Change and Power and Destruction upon the nation of Israel?  And by her appearance on the Empire State Building, is Kali saying, "Now is my Time"?
     You may think this is all just my fanciful, over-exaggerated imagination.  But I have found that the themes throughout the Bible are not limited to ancient times.  They have been repeated throughout the cycles of man's history.  But, we don't have to be influenced by this adulterous and deceiving generation.  Just reading the comments after some of the articles on this spectacle showed me how easily the world is fooled by those who will say that all religions are the same.
     But we know better.  We can stand our ground, denounce such unfaithfulness, and speak louder of the power of YHWH; the power to overcome and defeat all such false idols and the devastation that follows in the wake of their worship.  We will not surrender to this spirit of Jezebel or any of her fellow false goddesses.  Artists can paint their portraits across the skyline of NYC; but they will all disappear when the coming of the King of Kings is visible to the whole world.  It will soon be His time!

1 Kings 21:25    "There was none who sold himself to do what was evil in the sight of the Lord like Ahab, whom Jezebel his wife incited."

Think Agenda 21 Abuses Our Freedoms? Take A Look At Agenda 2030!

     Thanks to the website, End of the American Dream, for providing the following exciting news (wink, wink).  Next month, the Pope is traveling to New York City to kick off a conference at the United Nations in which "The 2030 Agenda" will be presented to the world.

     We are all familiar with the "sustainable" aspects of the UN's Agenda 21, whose stated goal was to protect the environment in the form of a  "comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations system, governments and major groups, in every area in which humans impact the environment.”  This was conveniently encapsulated under a comprehensive objective called "climate change".

     Now, of course, it was also stated that such plans were non-binding, and voluntary, but someone forgot to tell the governments of the world (including ours) who have been trying to implement restrictions on the world's human population through Agenda 21 since its inception in 1992.  

     Under the guise of providing adequate shelter for all; promoting sustainable land-use planning and management; promoting sustainable energy and transport systems in human settlements; and other supposed moral objectives to care for the world's underprivileged, it is really all about terminating our private property rights in favor of confiscation and controlling the world's population and food supply... all voluntary, of course.

     But this new global initiative is being billed as "a new Universal Agenda for humanity".  In addition to addressing climate change, it also sets ambitious goals for areas such as economics, health, energy, education, agriculture, gender equality and a whole host of other issues.... in other words, the globalists want to usher in the One World Government that controls every aspect of our lives.  Think I'm kidding?  Here is a portion of the preamble of Agenda 2030:

     This Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity. It also seeks to strengthen universal peace in larger freedom. We recognize that eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including extreme poverty, is the greatest global challenge and an indispensable requirement for sustainable development.

     All countries and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative partnership, will implement this plan. We are resolved to free the human race from the tyranny of poverty and want, and to heal and secure our planet. We are determined to take the bold and transformative steps which are urgently needed to shift the world onto a sustainable and resilient path. As we embark on this collective journey, we pledge that no one will be left behind.

     The 17 Sustainable Development Goals and 169 targets which we are announcing today demonstrate the scale and ambition of this new universal Agenda. They seek to build on the Millennium Development Goals and complete what these did not achieve. They seek to realize the human rights of all and to achieve gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls. They are integrated and indivisible and balance the three dimensions of sustainable development: the economic, social and environmental.

     I don't know about you, but this sounds awfully forceful and authoritative to me.  When you read the 17 core goals of the Agenda, they sound utopian and idealistic ... things such as "End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture", and ... "Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all", or ... "Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels", and one more ... "Reduce inequality within and among countries."  Notice that the word "sustainable" is evident in nearly all of  them, while there is no mention of individual rights or how they are going to get individual landowners to cooperate. And this new agenda gives no perception that is voluntary, does it?

     You see individual liberty and freedom aren't really conducive to a "global initiative".  You can't have people doing what they want if you plan on controlling every aspect of their lives.  After all, it's "bad for the planet."  And you might be interested to know that one of the goals of the sustainable development globalists is to push the human population into giant “megacities” and to allow nature to recapture much of what has already been settled by humanity.  See where this is going?  They can't have people living in rural areas growing their own food, and living sustainable lives on their own!  They must be controlled!

     So no matter how the Pope or other world leaders try to soft sell the idea to us, we mustn't be fooled.  This is just the next phase of mankind's steady march towards a new world order and the sudden and powerful deception of the Anti-Christ.  But those of us who put our faith in Jesus Christ and are covered by His blood need not fear.  Our eternal freedom cannot be taken from us and we shall never disown or renounce our Savior.  The only thing that we need to sustain us is our Lord's Grace... and it will be sufficient.

To read more about Agenda 2030, and this new universal initiative for humanity, click here.

Psalm 2:1-3     Why do the nations rage and the peoples plot in vain? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord and against his Anointed, saying, “Let us burst their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.” 

Ready For This? Sex With Angels

      What I'm about to talk about will seem over the top, hard to believe, and frankly, unworthy of discussion among Christians.  But apparently it is a taboo subject that is far more common than one might expect, and is as old as man himself.
     I don't know how to begin any other way but just to dive in ... I had been hearing preposterous stories of Hollywood stars giving glowing reports of sex with "heavenly angels".  Thinking it was some kind of publicity stunt, I blew it off.  Then I began hearing deliverance ministers talking about the horror stories of people who had first welcomed such visitations, but soon began to dread the attacks which were destroying their lives.
     It all seemed like headlines from the latest supermarket tabloids... but these people believed it happened to them and were able to graphically describe the occasions.  Such is the case with actress Lucy Liu in an interview she did with US magazine:  "I was sleeping on my futon on the floor, and some sort of spirit came down from God knows where and made love to me. It was sheer bliss. I felt everything. I climaxed. And then he floated away. It was almost like what might have happened to Mary. That’s how it felt. Something came down and touched me, and now it watches over me." I am appalled at the inference that what happened to Ms. Liu can be prepared to the Holy Spirit, but how convenient of the devil to try to counterfeit this ideal.
     And, of course, there was the concern over the lyrics in Katy Perry's song, E.T.:  "You’re so hypnotizing. Could you be the devil, could you be an angel? Your touch magnetizing. Feels like I am floating. Leaves my body glowing. They say be afraid. You’re not like the others futuristic lover. Different DNA. They don’t understand you. You’re from a whole other world. A different dimension. You opened my eyes. I’m ready to go. Lead me into the light."
     What is so disturbing to me is that both of these accounts are being accepted in pop culture as something popular; something positive; something "spiritual" that watches over them and leads them to the light.... something to be envied and sought after.  Those of us who are aware of the increase in spiritual warfare are all too mindful that this is a seductive attack by the dark side.  But is it new to this generation?
     We just have to go back a few decades to see it occurring in the supposedly innocent song lyrics of Roy Orbison's Mystery Girl:  "Darkness falls and she will take me by the hand, Take me to some twilight land. Where all but love is grey. Where I can't find my way. Without her as my guide...Night falls I'm cast beneath her spell. Daylight comes our heaven turns to hell. Am I left to burn and burn eternally....She's a mystery to me. She's a Mystery Girl. She's a Mystery Girl... In the night of love words tangled in her hair. Words soon to disappear. A love so sharp it cut like a switchblade to my heart; words tearing me apart. She tears again my bleeding heart. I want to run she's pulling me apart. Fallen angel cries, And I just melt away. She's a mystery to me; She's a Mystery Girl."
     Did you catch that reference to a fallen angel?  Kind of view this song a little differently now, don't you?  It's a pretty explicit rendering of the power of these spiritual entities who initially bring experiences of lustful pleasure, but eventually cause their "heaven to turn to hell".  And in case you are still not buying this evil experience, there is actually a definition of what is happening.  It is called Spectrophilia, and is defined as "sexual attraction to ghosts or sexual arousal from images in mirrors, also the phenomenon of sexual encounters between ghosts and humans."  One element that is usually a big part of the experience is the rape of both men and women, usually while they are sleeping... that sounds like what happened in Roy Orbison's song.

     There will be those who say this is all part of ancient mythology; folk lore that has existed for centuries.  Among the more famous stories of such sexual encounters with spirits are Gilgamesh (a post flood god-human hybrid (demigod) that had sex with a goddess (supernatural female entity). The result was Gilgamesh being born 2/3 god and 1/3 human);  Achilles and Hercules (both products of supernatural sexual encounters that result in god-human hybrids or demigods); Merlin, who according to legend, was a cambion, which is part demon and part human. Often times that fact is left out of the King Arthur story; and of course the Bible's accounting of the Nephilim in Genesis 6, who were the sons of fallen angels and human women.
     So, if you still want to dismiss all this as mythology or folklore, ask yourself this question:  Is it a coincidence that the idea of sex with the supernatural exists all throughout history, regardless of politics, religion, or economic status? And can you dismiss that in Luke 17 Jesus says that the Last Days will be like the days of Lot?  Yes, He says that people "ate, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they built"... but what else did they do?  Seek to have sex with the angels that came to Lot's house.  Although those angels were sent from God, man's appetite for "angel sex" has not abated, and Satan is only too happy to oblige.
     Why do I find it necessary to bring this situation to your attention?  Because our kids are being sucked into an occult entertainment world that celebrates such liaisons... besides Katy Perry's music and Lucy Liu's glowing report, they are inundated with the likes of True Blood on TV, and the Twilight movie series, where human girls fall in love with vampires.  It's just one more repetition of Satan's ancient practice of drawing us away from our Savior and into his clutches.  I'm sure there is so much more than I am even aware of; especially in video games, animation, and play-acting diversions, such as Dungeons and Dragons.  
     We must quit thinking that our civilization is too advanced to fall for the deceptions that the ancient cultures embraced, and realize that we are just as vulnerable.  We give Satan an open invitation and legal right to visit these dark entities upon us.  And please be aware that there is no age limit upon those whom the devil tempts ... Guard yourself and your children!

Please take the time to read this informative article which provided much of the background for this blog post.

James 1:13-14     Let no one say when he is tempted, “I am being tempted by God,” for God cannot be tempted with evil, and he himself tempts no one. But each person is tempted when he is lured and enticed by his own desire.

Mark 1:8

 I have baptized you with water, 

but He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit.

     We are all familiar with the Scripture that recounts the baptism of Jesus by John the Baptist.  We know that John preached repentance for the forgiveness of sins, and that baptism represented the release of sins from off our flesh and our rebirth as a new person in God.  But how many of us fully understand the difference between water baptism and the Baptism of the Holy Spirit?

     I am saddened that today's Church no longer seems to emphasize these two important gifts of faith, or their differences.  I have endeavored to educate myself on this topic and would like to share what I have learned.  I do not intend my opinion to be the conclusive teaching on the matter, but I hope you will realize how important it is for us to understand and seek both these gifts from God.

     I assume that everyone is mostly familiar with water baptism; it is an outward action taken by a Believer to declare his/her allegiance to God; both a profession of faith in Jesus to the people of this world, and is viewed as a physical declaration of loyalty to God by the spiritual world.

     Baptism of the Holy Spirit is an action taken by God to indwell a Believer; an eternal association with the Holy Spirit; we are bound to Him.  He enables us to continue the Lord’s work; He is the agent through which we receive the power and authority from God.  We receive divine inspiration to share the doctrine and teachings of Christ. It is a God-mandated, spiritual commission from God, with real evidence and tangible benefits. 

     Can you see the difference?  While water baptism is an important part of a Believer's process of coming to God, the Baptism of the Holy Spirit is a serious undertaking for the Believer.  We must arrive at a sanctified place in our lives; a place where we have confessed every known sin and fully cleansed ourselves of any desires to live in the flesh.  It is not something done lightly, nor is it automatically granted.  In fact, the evidence of having received this holy Baptism can be quite different for different people.

     Some people have a spontaneous reaction ... they speak in tongues (a private prayer language between them and God).  And I know that there will be those who say this gift is no longer present in the lives of modern Believers, but I know people to whom this has happened.  Others receive some sort of manifestation; some kind of physical response … they may cry, or feel a swelling in their soul,  or feel the presence of the Holy Spirit in some physical manner.  Still others may have absolutely nothing happen -- and it appears that this is what usually happens; there is no clear manifestation at the moment that one is baptized into the Holy Spirit.

     However, there will be evidences and benefits of this sacred baptism as the Believer begins to live out his eternal association with the Holy Spirit.  Some of these confirmations are as follows:  People find that they have a deeper personal relationship with God, and a real hunger for the Word.  You will find that you have "an anointing" for whatever purpose God has called you to in His Kingdom.  For example, if God calls you to be a doctor, then you will have His supernatural power operating through you so you can then become a great doctor, not just an average doctor.  

     You start seeing things in Scripture and in your life more clearly; the Holy Spirit is truly your "Helper", which is one of His titles.  You may feel as if you are hearing more clearly from God; knowing how He wants you to proceed in matters regarding His Kingdom-- your energy levels and your intelligence levels seem to increase exponentially.  

     And those goose bumps you habitually get?  Or the chill that runs down your spine when you are praying for an answer or contemplating how God wants you to respond or think about a situation?  Those are manifestations that the Holy Spirit is communicating God's will in your life.  

     These are just some of the benefits and evidences that you have received the Baptism of the Holy Spirit.  For the longest time I felt that it had to be some momentous occurrence, some earth-shattering event -- and for some people it is!  But not everyone will share the same experience.  As you grow in your faith, and progress through your salvation experience you will grow to recognize the Holy Spirit's presence in your life.  You will hunger to do the Lord's work and to share what He has done in you.  You will know that you have been given a commission from God, and you will see your path clearly.  It is truly a gift from God that can effect your life and the world!  

     

For What It's Worth ... My Debate Analysis

   

     As I stated on Thursday, I don't really expect the 2016 Presidential election to miraculously change the trajectory of this nation.  I think the writing is on the wall... the global elite are inching us closer to the One World Government prophesied in the Bible, and the sovereignty of our country is being swallowed up in multilateral treaties, detrimental trade agreements, and conciliatory weapons deals with terrorist States.  We are too far in debt, morally bankrupt, and willing to sell even our own land to foreign interests just to make a buck.  I'm not sure that one man, or woman, can make a difference at this point.
     Yet I was one of the 24,000,000 people who tuned in to the Republican Primary Debate, perhaps hoping that I would see some sign from God that He's changed His mind about letting us reap the rewards of our sinful ways... not that we don't deserve whatever is in our future.  However, I didn't receive any heavenly vision, and none of the men on the stage threw down a staff that turned into a serpent and exclaimed "Follow Me!"; but I did make some interesting observations:
•  Let's start with the elephant in the room ... Donald Trump.  It seemed quite apparent from the opening salvo, that the Fox News moderators had their marching orders:  attack Trump.  They tried to make him look divisive by pointing out that if he runs as a Third Party candidate, it will most likely split the vote, and hand the victory to the Democratic Party.  The intent was clear ... marginalize him.
     In an attempt to point out his perceived arrogance and, possibly, to alienate the female vote, Megyn Kelly did a pretty good job of showing off her own ego and conceit.  It was apparent that she dislikes Trump, and by repeating some of his alleged name-calling of women, she came off as unprofessional and vitriolic.  I wonder who gave her that assignment?
     But in the end, the Donald gave a good show -- and it was just that, a show.  He gave no substantial solutions to America's problems, and no definitive answers to how he would run the country.  The rhetoric was eloquent and forceful, but I never heard how he would accomplish his lofty goals. Unfortunately, by the results of the exit polls, there are still millions of Americans who are enamored with his politically incorrect attacks against the Washington establishment.  I would at least hope that if these people are planning on voting, they will take a little more time to consider that he's merely tapping in to the frustration in the country, and look beyond the sound bite to see if there is any substance to him.  It's hard for me not to wonder if somehow he's figured out how to profit from all this showmanship.  And I'm still not convinced he's not the fox in the hen house (if you know what I mean).
•  I found it interesting who was asked repeated questions, and who must have been chomping at the bit, wondering if they were going to be allowed to take an active part in this debate.  One such candidate was Ben Carson, and I found him refreshing and a decidedly non-Washington contender.  He would obviously need some schooling on the duties of the President, but he kind of reminds me of the citizen-servant in that old Jimmy Stewart movie, Mr. Smith Goes To Washington.  He is suggestive of the original intention of our Founders that normal citizens would get involved in serving in our government for selfless reasons; not to enrich themselves.
     I was extremely impressed with his heartfelt closing statement; that he would "pick up the baton of freedom, because freedom is not free, and we must fight for it every day. Every one of us must fight for it, because we’re fighting for our children and the next generation."
•  I liked Ted Cruz's ideas, but not his delivery.  The endless pauses drove me crazy ... too coached, and too unnatural.  I've read that he was the best debater in law school, and that's what I felt I was watching -- a debate team competition.  Just talk to me, Ted ... let go of your "debate mode" and have a conversation with me.
•  Rand Paul seemed to have a "small man complex", pouncing on the other candidates (especially Chris Christie, who was just too much of a politician).  We get it, Rand.  You want us to see you as "a different kind of Republican" -- the one who will not cower from standing tall for the American people; which is something the Republican Party has lacked throughout the last 8 years.  But it came across a little too caustic.
•  Jeb Bush seemed dazed and confused; doesn't have the killer instinct of his big brother.
•  John Kasich shows promise and held his own; Mike Huckabee was a smooth talker (the consummate politician); sailed through any real scrutiny of his endorsement of Common Core; and Scott Walker handled the land mines laid out for him on his former position on abortion without missing a step.
•  Marco Rubio was the pleasant surprise of the night for me.  Always articulate, he looked like a statesman; like someone who would be proud of representing this country, and someone I could be proud of.  He still remembers what it was like to live paycheck to paycheck, and to owe massive student loans; yet he's been a quick learner of how to deal with Washington politics.  The real question remains... is he for real?  Can he resist the pressure that will (or has been) put on him to "play ball" with the puppet masters?
      Of all the candidates who invoked God that night, his remarks touched me the most. Not that I felt the others were insincere, but Rubio acknowledged that this nation has been extraordinarily blessed.  And you could hear the emotion in his voice when he said, "[we need to] pass a law in this country that says all human life at every stage of its development is worthy of protection.  In fact, I think that law already exists. It is called the Constitution of the United States... And let me go further. I believe that every single human being is entitled to the protection of our laws, whether they can vote or not. Whether they can speak or not. Whether they can hire a lawyer or not. Whether they have a birth certificate or not. And I think future generations will look back at this history of our country and call us barbarians for murdering millions of babies who we never gave them a chance to live."
     There was so much more to this debate that I haven't even mentioned.... immigration, the economy, our veterans and the VA, the tax code; over-regulation and small business, just to name a few.  There wasn't a real loser in the bunch, as far as being able to present a confident and impassioned strength.  The field was strong and they're ready for the opposition.  It was almost enough to give me hope that we still stand a chance with the right man in office.  It was almost enough to make me think this election still matters and that the process will be fair and honest.... almost.  There is a lot that can happen in the next 15 months, and only God knows what the outcome will be.  I just pray He will be merciful.

Psalm 33:12     "Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord, the people whom He has chosen as His heritage!"

Post-Christian America: "The Benedict Option" vs. "Flying Our Freak Flags"

     Let's face it.  Christianity in America is undergoing a change.  We cannot say that we are physically suffering as our fellow Christians in the rest of the world are ... yet.  Our form of "persecution" is mainly cultural at the moment, and the response of the Christian community is fluid and varied.  I recently read two very informative and well-written articles explaining the different ways in which organized Christianity is responding to the changes in this country's religious landscape.  I will now attempt to elucidate the two options, and show how each is not only a valid reaction to the attack on our faith, but a picture of how we might live out our faith in a post-Christian America.
    

     The first option is what is commonly called "The Benedict Option".  And in case, like me, you need to be schooled on exactly what this means, here is my understanding:  "The Benedict Option" is a catch-all name for an alternative lifestyle for Christians who wish to no longer support a culture (monetarily, philosophically, or socially) that they see as flying in the face of their faith.  They no longer wish to perpetrate the corrupt "Babylonian" culture of this country.  As author, Rod Dreher explains it, "The contemporary values of this nation no longer correspond to the values of our faith, and so we seek to construct alternative forms of community that enable us to withstand long-term chaos and the inevitable breakdown of the broader social and cultural order."
      What would that look like?  Again, from my limited understanding, it would encompass everything from choosing to detach ourselves from social media and entertainment forms such as TV and movies, to forming literal communities who share the same faith, traditions and social philosophies.  It doesn't mean that groups behave like monasteries, or communes, and deprive themselves of social interaction or community with the culture in general.  It simply means that people choose to surround themselves with like-minded people who share the goal of serving God as the Bible dictates; not as the culture demands, or as a prescribed brand of "American" Christianity.
     I can see many Christians naturally following this path.  As we are faced with the reality that Gay Marriage is now the law of the land; and as the leaders of our government have chosen to continue to use our tax dollars to fund an organization that promotes and profits from abortion, it is clear that our beliefs are in conflict with that of the nation.  If we are to be true to our faith and our calling as followers of Jesus Christ, it will be necessary that we strengthen ourselves against the infringement of the culture upon our lives.  I tend to liken it to living "in this world", but not being "of this world".
     On the other hand, I guess I would have to say that an all-encompassing term for the second option would be "Unconventional Evangelicalism"; a detaching of yourself from the un-Christian ways of the culture, while at the same time engaging the culture in active dialogue on the social and political issues, from a Gospel perspective.  One of the foremost proponents of this option is Pastor Russell Moore, who will preside over the Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission’s 2015 national conference.  In his book, Onward: Engaging The Culture Without Losing The Gospel, Moore encourages Christians to embrace the new strangeness that Christianity now represents in a post-Christian America.

     Here's our new reality ... Christians are now seen as outside the "norm" of modern American values.  “Our message will be seen as increasingly freakish to American culture,” he writes. “Let’s embrace the freakishness, knowing that such freakishness is the power of God unto salvation.”
     In an interview with Emma Green, of The Atlantic, Moore said he is often approached by people after church, asking if Christianity is dying in America.  “Behind that question is an assumption that Christianity is a sub-culture of American life,” he told Green. “I think what is dying is cultural, nominal Christianity, and I don’t think we should panic about that. I think we should see that as an act of God’s grace.”
     Moore explains that the concept of "American Christianity" led to a false perception that Christianity was about God, Country and Tradition ... instead of the truth that its about sin, and Christ, and blood.  Jesus never gave us "a mission to promote ‘values’ in the first place, but to speak instead of sin and of righteousness and judgment; of Christ and His kingdom.”
     Moore believes that we need to start looking at ourselves as part of the broader reality of Christianity; not as white, Protestant, American believers, sitting each Sunday in our church pews; but as the Body of Christ in the world... outcasts, and ministering to the needs of those most in need.  How do we do that in our American culture without "losing the Gospel", as his book title proclaims?
      I believe that it means we have to represent Christ in a culture that doesn't resemble Him.  What does that look like?  I am often struck by the reluctance (if not outright disdain) that some Christians feel for, say, the homosexual community.  They do not understand how I can have gay friends that I care about, yet still not betray God's commandments against that lifestyle.  For me, it is simple ... Jesus showed compassion and love to the Samaritan woman at the well, and to the adulteress woman brought to the Temple -- while taking the opportunity to share His Message with both and telling the adulteress to sin no more.  How are we to affect the culture, if we do not engage the culture?  How can you share the Good News of Jesus Christ, if you are not willing to develop friendships with those who don't know Him?  Jesus didn't compromise on sin, and neither do I.  But if my goal is to tell someone of the saving power of Christ, how do I do that if I ignore them?
     In the end, I agree with both options, and contend that we need to combine these two approaches into a healthy means of living out our faith.  We need to recognize that the image we had of a "Christian America" is no longer applicable to the culture at large.
     Let's admit it, those of us who believe that the Bible is the inerrant Word of God, and live our lives accordingly, are most likely in the minority of Americans who call themselves "Christians".  That term is beginning to cover a lot of different belief systems -- from those who accept gay marriage and abortion; to those who believe in the political definition of Social Justice; to those who don't believe in Evil and Hell; to those who think the Bible is no longer relevant ... and they all call themselves "Christians"!
     But, that doesn't mean we Biblical Christians stop being who we are -- followers of the Son of God -- and living our lives as He commanded us.  It means that we must both detach ourselves from the un-Godly ways of society, as well as recommit ourselves to the strict spiritual doctrines of the Bible as we proudly and boldly engage with those in the culture who do not agree with us.
    To accomplish this goal, it will be much like walking a tightrope, but consider this:  Let's not yield to compromise or concessions in order to make ourselves appealing to the culture.  Instead, let's be proud of how different we appear to the culture, and glory in our "strangeness"; let's be separate, but inviting.  After all, that's how our Lord lived His life on this earth.  He marched to a different drummer within the culture to which He was born; yet, He never compromised His allegiance to our Father, while inviting everyone who "had an ear to hear" to accept the glorious promises of the Kingdom of God.  Sounds like a well-balanced plan to me!

For a more complete understanding of the differences between these two options, click here and here. 
     
Colossians 4:5-6   "Walk in wisdom toward outsiders, making the best use of the time. Let your speech always be gracious, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how you ought to answer each person."

 
     

     

The Race Is On!

     I'm sorry, but I happen to be one of those who no longer puts much faith in our national elections.  There was a time when I thought my vote counted for something, and the American people truly had a voice in who governs our nation.  Perhaps I've just grown cynical as I watch those in power get richer at our expense, and the election process become more corrupt and fraudulent.  I no longer trust the election results, and I believe those that are chosen to run for office are selected; not by the people of this country, but by power brokers who answer to unknown elitists who govern the world.
     I know that sounds like some dystopian theory, like 1984 or Brave New World, but I've realized that any chance of Utopia has long been abandoned.  Just consider the scandals that we've faced in the last few years ... Fast and Furious, Benghazi, the targeting by IRS, Hillary's missing emails, sanctuary cities ... have any of these investigations by Congressional Committees yielded any results?  Are they intended to?  Or are they just for show; to mollify the populace's outrage over the immoral and unethical practices of those who are supposed to be representing us?

     And that brings us to the primetime Republican debates this evening.  Think they will yield any true results?  Or are they all for show, too?  Are the 16, or so, candidates just a ruse to make us think we really have a choice, or that we stand a chance of picking the best candidate that embodies our values?  Sure, they all are trying to claim the mantle of "true Conservative", because they think that will garner the most support from the dissatisfied American voter.
     So, will we really hear their true positions on policies and where they want to take the country -- or will they all listen to their political strategists and "game" the air time to try to appeal to a broad spectrum of voters; or better yet, try to deliver the cleverest soundbite that will be repeated ad nauseam on the morning talk shows?  Other than Donald Trump -- who might just be the biggest "gamer" of them all -- will anyone step outside the tightly scripted box and give us just a touch of reality?
     Will the questions even be fair and balanced?  Or will one or two candidates get "soft balls", while others are targeted to fail?  Don't get me wrong ... I'm going to be watching!  But not because I expect that there is one candidate who will rise to the top and be our knight in shining armor.  I'm actually going to  watch because I hope to be able to foretell, by the answers, what the true objective is for the next President of these United States.
     You see, I'm nearly convinced that this person has already been selected by the powers-that-be, and it doesn't really matter whether they are Republican or Democrat.  The path that this country will take has already been decided and put in motion.  The 45th President will just help move us in that direction.  And will you really be surprised if we end up with another Bush or Clinton? Really???
     Frankly, I am amazed at my own skepticism and distrust.  Just a few years ago, I still believed in the honor and propriety of our election process.  I thought there was a significant difference in the philosophies of the two major parties, and that the will of the people would win out.  But it seems as if the veil has been removed from the process, and I see that we've been deceived for a very long time.  I think we would be surprised if we dug too far under the surface of the men who have led this nation during the last century.  I will leave the conspiracy theories to others who have done extensive research, but I have to admit that I no longer wear my rose-colored glasses.
     It will be interesting to see how these debates play out tonight.  Will there be a discernible and underlying message to the American people about what we can expect after the next election?  Will we be able to tell who has already been crowned "The Chosen One"?  Will there be any man who is God's true representative on that stage?
     I think that is my greatest fear ... that I will finish the night feeling as if God has relinquished His authority in establishing those who rule us, and is leaving us to our own particular schemes, agendas, and tactics.  And I think we all know how that will turn out ... so, if that is the case, I invite you to join me, my family, and my friends in strengthening our faith to overcome whatever the election might bring.  We are ultimately responsible in how we live out each day -- whether in prosperity or hardship; success or failure; or in the glow of His Light or the depths of Darkness.  Remember, we are not of this world; this is our temporary citizenship.  The more Americans who can realize that and put their faith in the next world; the fewer Americans there will be who will cast all their hope on the polling results of an inconsequential debate.  Put your trust in no man!

Psalm 40:4   "Blessed is the man who makes the Lord his trust, who does not turn to the proud, to those who go astray after a lie!"

Maryam Revisited: God Speaks Through A Child

     It has been a year since ISIS declared the Caliphate and the world began to see just what that meant.  In February of this year, I brought you the story of Maryam, a young Iraqi Christian girl, forced to flee her home near Mosul as ISIS instituted its apocalyptic persecution of Christians.  As just one of millions of refugees, it would have been easy for the world to ignore her plight... except that there was something special about Maryam.  As part of a group of refugee children interviewed by a Christian Broadcasting Network reporter, the world was stunned by her unfaltering faith as she declared that she had no desire to retaliate against ISIS for destroying her world ... "I won't do anything to them," Myriam asserted. "I will only ask God to forgive them."

     It was apparent as you watched that video that this child was filled with the Spirit of God.  (Maryam's portion of the interview begins at the 1 minute, 4 second mark).  There was a peace in her eyes.  And in the midst of such upheaval and violence, she possessed a serenity that could only come from Heaven.  At the time, I was left wondering how we American Christians would react if faced with sudden removal from our homes and unprecedented persecution.
     Now, just a mere six months later, although we are not experiencing the level of violence that is being perpetuated against Middle Eastern Christians, we are certainly seeing an abandonment and an excoriation of true Christian values in our culture ... and sadly, in the Church!  The rhetoric from anti-West extremists, and ISIS, itself, is more pronounced and specifically directed towards us; and it seems inevitable that our foreign policy will enable those who hate us the most to have the means to plunge the world into the chaos and destruction that mark the End Times.  So, how is your faith holding up?  Are you able to forgive those who wish us harm? Are you fearful?  Can you say that you possess the peace and confidence exhibited by this young Christian refugee?
     I was thrilled to find that CBN has released a new video after catching up with young Maryam, who along with her family, lives in a small, two bedroom trailer in a community of displaced Christians in Erbil, the capital of Kurdistan in northern Iraq.  Now 11, she is better able to elucidate on her ability to forgive those who hate her.  "In the Bible, Jesus said to us, 'Don't be afraid, I am with you.' And also, He said forgive others no matter who they are [who] hate you. You have to forgive them," she said. "Jesus is my Father, and He is my Creator. I have no one else better than Him. When ISIS drove us out of our home, His hand was on us and He saved us."

     Maryam said she cherishes the Bible because it is God's love story to humanity.  "The only story in the Bible is the story of the resurrection of Christ Jesus the Lord because through that story, we can have hope."  She says that prayer is an important part of her life.  She doesn't pray for a bigger or nicer home, or more things.  "When I pray, I pray that God might help us to go back home. And also that the peace of God might come all over Iraq and also, may God forgive ISIS."
     It is an interpreter's voice you hear as she speaks in her native language, but you don't need to understand the words she speaks to apprehend where her message comes from ... it's in her eyes and the force of her voice.  "The words I am speaking to you are not coming from a random place. They come from the Holy Spirit," she insisted. "The Holy Spirit gave me these words to tell you."
     Furthermore, she has words of advice for us here in America.  They are aimed at American children, but are words we all need to hear.  Maryam advised Christian children in the United States and elsewhere to love God and share their faith with friends.  "They don't need to be frightened and also, things that happen in their lives, they should learn from us and our lives," she said.  "This should not be to get something or to get glory for ourselves," she continued. "It is for the sake of God, because God lives and we want to do everything for the glory of God and also for exalting God in our lives."
     I can't help but feel as if I've been schooled by a messenger sent straight from God through a child who has the faith of a true disciple of Jesus.  The message is simple and fundamental; no embellishment and no distortion -- just the pure essence of the Word.  And that Word is not coming from some flashy, million-dollar, mega church that seats 5,000; or accompanied by a rock band and showy rhetoric -- but from a small trailer in a crowded refugee camp in the midst of horrendous Christian persecution.  Do we need any further proof that God speaks into the darkness of the world?
     As I view the lukewarm status of the American Church, I am humbled by this child's faith.  We call ourselves Christians -- but are we living our lives for the glory of God?  Are all of our actions and our words for the purpose of exalting God?  I pray that we do not face the tests of this child and her family, or those who have already been martyred.  But if it is God's will, I pray that the Holy Spirit will guide me as He has Maryam... to speak the Gospel Message into the world and convey the peace that comes with such abundant faith.  Thank you, Maryam.  Once again, you have shown us the power of the love of God.  May He continue to use you to profess the Gospel, and may He bless you and keep you and your family safe.

Colossians 3:16   "Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly, teaching and admonishing one another in all wisdom, singing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, with thankfulness in your hearts to God."




   

Bible or Constitution?

     That was the question presented to Presidential candidate Dr. Ben Carson on this week's Meet The Press.  I find it interesting that more of these political news shows are beginning to consider questions presented by the public, from such sources as Facebook and Twitter, for instance.  Although these questions can be more illuminating of a candidate's positions, and tend to be more original and authentic than those presented by the MSM hacks, they can present no less of a trap for the respondents.

     And that's the position that Dr. Carson found himself in, when host Chuck Todd asked him, "Does the Bible have authority over the Constitution?”  Now, before you give a knee-jerk answer, stop and consider this ... was that question a trap?  Knowing that Dr. Carson is a religious man, was it designed, not to gain information, but with a view to reproach him in some way or other; so that no matter how he answered it, he would incur the resentment of one side of the argument or the other?  Was it wise of Dr. Carson to avoid stating a concrete position, and instead, point out that the answer to the question is "not so simple"; that the question must be asked in context, "about a specific passage of the Bible and a specific portion of the Constitution"?
     OR, could there be a deeper significance to the framing of the question ... such as a subtle effort to point out that neither the Bible nor the Constitution have any authority in our land?  And if they no longer exert any power or influence, who should be in control?
     The point of my blog today is not to justify or condemn the way Ben Carson chose to answer the question, but to ask you to consider your own position, and look at the significance of who has authority.   When it comes to the laws of this nation, how do you view the authority of both the Bible and the Constitution?  Is one superior to the other?  Is it possible for them to work together to govern this land?  When the Constitution was written, did the Founding Fathers give any consideration to the Bible?  I'm sure if you conducted one of those "man on the street" interviews tomorrow, you'd be hard pressed to get an intelligent answer to any of those questions; our ability to critically think through such philosophical questions has been seriously eroded.  But let's take a stab at it, and see what kinds of considerations we can apply.  After all, it is a crucial and consequential concern in these days, don't you think?
     Let me first say that I always find it revealing to scan through the comments on controversial subjects like this.  And as could be expected, they mostly fell into two camps --- those who felt that the Founding Fathers considered Judeo-Christian principles when drafting the Constitution, and those who defiantly maintained that we are now, and have always been, "a secular nation".  They even went so far as to assert that "there is not one mention of God, Jesus, the Bible, or Christianity in all of the Constitution"... and they are right.
     The 40 names that are listed as signers of the U.S. Constitution are a mixture of secularists, Deists, and committed Christians; yet I contend that all would have agreed that the general principles of Christianity drove the desire for independence and individual freedom that resulted in the American Revolution and the subsequent need to form a model of government.  In response to why the Constitution is devoid of any Biblical references, I like the answer provided by Bill Flax, a contributor to Forbes.com:  "Perhaps, because as James Madison remonstrated regarding inserting “Jesus Christ” into earlier legislation, 'The better proof of reverence for that holy name would be not to profane it by making it a topic of legislative discussion.' "
     I think it is quite evident that the Founders of our nation, through the Revolutionary War years, and the succeeding years of establishing a government, never intended for this nation to become theocratic, or a one-size-fits-all religious state.  It was never their intention to create a system of government in which the rulers reigned in the name of God.  That being said, I still contend that they wanted citizens to live their lives as free men, governed by a system of laws that was written through the Biblical prism; recognizing that Christianity's morals and principles were valuable in creating a stable social fabric.
     Need proof?  Consider these statements by some of our more famous Founders:  "Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other" -- (John Adams).  "I have lived a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth -- that God Governs in the affairs of men" -- (Benjamin Franklin).  "By renouncing the Bible, philosophers swing from their moorings upon all moral subjects. . . . It is the only correct map of the human heart that ever has been published. . . . All systems of religion, morals, and government not founded upon it [the Bible] must perish, and how consoling the thought, it will not only survive the wreck of these systems but the world itself. "The Gates of Hell shall not prevail against it." [Matthew 1:18]" -- (Benjamin Rush).  There ... I think I've made my point.  The Founders recognized that 1) our Constitution was designed for a moral and religious people, 2) whose affairs are governed by God, and 3) without the Bible as a foundational support, nations will eventually perish.
     So, back to our original question ... Does the Bible have authority over the Constitution?  While answering for myself, I must invoke my Biblical worldview, which influences all my decisions in life.  I believe that God is the Ultimate Authority in this world that He created.  But I also know that it says in His Word that He appoints rulers over nations by His authority, and we are to be loyal to that government... as long as they are loyal to God's laws.
     I truly believe that God was involved in the creation of our Constitution through the men that He put in authority.  At that time, these men foresaw a nation of individuals who were generally governed by Biblical precepts -- checks and balances and a limited government were at the center of the Constitution, and would serve such a Biblically-minded society well.  Then, as now, I believe that the Bible has authority over each of us as individuals, and the Constitution has authority over the government.  That combination has worked for us, and contributed to a generally balanced co-existence between the two powers, as long as we continued to embrace Biblical morals and principles.
     But as God and the Bible have become more irrelevant in our society -- indeed, despised -- we have seen that both the Bible and the Constitution have lost their place in the governing of our nation.     In fact, there is a third player in the game, and it is Government, with a capital "G".  Since our society seems to want to eradicate the influence of both the Bible and the Constitution, is this even a relevant question anymore?  Clearly, the Bible is being mocked, derided, and re-conceptualized to serve the needs of the ungodly.  And, in its tattered state, is there enough of the Constitution left to warrant any real authority?
     Perhaps the more appropriate question is this: Is there enough of the Bible's influence in the Constitution to withstand its destruction by the Government?  Ultimately, as a faithful Christian, I have to go back to the one Truth that overrides all ... YHWH is Sovereign, Supreme, and the absolute Head of this State.  His Word is authority over everything man-made ... whether it is a governing document like the Constitution, or a governing body of men.  That might not be the politically expedient answer to give in a national interview, but we are at the stage in this nation (and the world) where it is time to quit playing the political game, and recognize Who has the real Power in this world.  Imagine if we had a candidate who had enough courage and the fear of God to make that announcement!

1 Chronicles 29:11-12    "Yours, O Lord, is the greatness and the power and the glory and the victory and the majesty, for all that is in the heavens and in the earth is Yours. Yours is the kingdom, O Lord, and You are exalted as head above all. Both riches and honor come from You, and You rule over all. In Your hand are power and might, and in Your hand it is to make great and to give strength to all."

Recommended Product: Kinesiology Tape & How-To Book

Disclaimer:  I am not a medical doctor and do not claim to offer professional advice.  I am simply relating my personal experience and suggesting that this product is something you might want to consider.  Obviously, you should contact your doctor if you have a serious injury, and for advice before using this product.       

     You've probably noticed this product if you've watched any serious sporting event in the last few years.  It can be seen as those long black pieces of tape applied to the athletes in various formations, depending on which muscle groups they are targeting.  It is known as kinesiology taping, and although many medical professionals may approach it with skepticism, I can tell you that it has been a long time since I have been this excited about a product, or felt I had found something that was essential to share with you.  I am very blessed to be in good health, and I try to do some form of exercise or physical activity every day so that I do not get too sedentary or incapable of moving quickly should some kind of emergency arise.
     But I'm sure most of you can sympathize when I say that the aches and pains are more frequent and take longer to rehab with each passing birthday.  A few years ago, I hyper-extended my knee and it has taken a long time for it to heal naturally.  (An orthopedic surgeon whom I visited told me that my meniscus was probably torn -- although X-rays did not show it -- and I would get tired of the pain and would return shortly, opting for surgery as the fix).  But I wanted to try to rehab it first instead of immediately going under the knife.
     The surgeon was correct; I did get tired of the pain, but I found that through the help and advice of a good friend who is a physical therapist, and my own persistence in doing the recommended exercises faithfully, my knee has recovered and getting stronger every day.  But I will tell you that it has taken at least two years to get back to a normal state.

     That has been the only real injury that I've encountered .... until several months ago.  I began feeling some discomfort in my deltoid muscle, but couldn't recall any strain from working out with weights, or any reason for the tenderness or occasional twinges of pain.  I felt strongly that I did not have a tear in the rotator cuff, and so opted to do some stretching exercises that would relieve the stiffness in the deltoid.  When the pain began to be a real inconvenience I asked my PT friend about it, and through the process of elimination figured out that the injury was likely due to the several hours a day I sit in my chair working at my laptop -- working on this blog, typing out my notes on the Bible class I teach, and the routine maintenance of my husband's business.  It seems that the source of the problem started in the trapezius/deltoid/latissimus dorsi muscle area across the back of my shoulder.  Apparently, as I'm sitting typing, I am not providing support to my arm, so there is a "pulling down" in this muscle group, which is inflaming my supraspinatus muscle and causing pain in my deltoid.
     I bought a computer tray to bring my laptop to the correct height, added pillows to the chair arms to rest my elbows on, and did everything I could think of to take the strain off my back and neck.  But nothing seemed to work, and it was beginning to affect my sleep; I would wake up in the morning after sleeping on that shoulder and it would be stiff and painful.  Finally, I decided to ask my PT friend what he thought of kinesiology tape, and he texted me back that they had had some success using it on their physical therapy patients.
     So I bought a roll of tape, watched a YouTube video on how to apply it for the supraspinatus muscle, and within just a couple of hours, I felt relief.  The real test came with sleeping with the tape on, and the good range of motion and lack of pain that I experienced the next morning.  I then decided to test it at a pistol shooting match over the weekend, where I spent two hours competing in the hot sun ... I was able to complete the match with no pain or disruption in my performance.  That's when I knew that this was something that could come in handy in the case of an emergency and needed to be a part of my long-term storage items.

     Think about it .... we are in the middle of hurricane season here in the South, and should the worst-case scenario happen, there will most likely be lots of minor injuries and sprains and strains as people deal with the aftermath.  For that matter, any type of crisis or emergency can result in unforeseen injuries.  If this product can temporarily relieve some physical impediment and allow you to take care of yourself and family, it will be a necessary item to have on hand.  I then took that situation a step further, and thought "what if we have no electricity and internet?"  There will be no YouTube video to watch on how to tape to provide support for a sprained ankle, wrist, or knee.  So, with the help of my husband, I found Kinesiology Taping: The Essential Step-by-Step Guide; what I think is the best book to illustrate the proper techniques for a wide variety of incidents, and I promptly ordered it.
     As you can see by the following editorial review on Amazon, this product can transcend sports injuries to be a useful tool for emergency situations; especially when no doctor is available:  This book focuses on the use of taping as a treatment for reducing pain, muscle tension, sprains, strains and many more injuries. It provides information on how you yourself can apply tape on your body for sports, exercise and daily activities. Some examples are support upright position, bruised ribs, pain in muscle movement, carpal tunnel syndrome, sore back, help with breathing, promote better healing of scars, headaches and menstrual cramps. Provided in the book are step-by-step diagrams, written instructions and width/amount of tape required for each condition. As well, there is a full body diagram of the individual muscles in the human body at the beginning of the book. This book contains considerable information for relieving pain and tension during exercise, sports and daily life. 
     The authors of the book are trained in physiotherapy and are strong advocates for self-taping to treat a variety of conditions and ailments.  I also ordered several rolls of the tape, and feel a sense of relief in that I have given our household one more advantage in dealing with emergency situations.  In the final analysis, I am all for any product that can be a positive and useful addition to our personal storehouse of resources.  And having tried it myself, I know it works, and have no hesitation in recommending it to you.  After all, anytime we can find a simple solution to the aches and pains of life, it is worth sharing.

3 John 1:2   "Beloved, I pray that all may go well with you and that you may be in good health, as it goes well with your soul."