I am often dumbfounded when I stop to consider the difference in my own middle and high school education as compared to what's taught these 35-40 years later. I can remember studying and memorizing Lincoln's Gettysburg address. I loved the long and exhaustive studies of Alfred, Lord Tennyson's Idylls of the King -- the epic twelve poems that retold the tales of the legendary King Arthur, his knights, his love for Guinevere and her tragic betrayal of him, and the rise and fall of Arthur's kingdom.
As the website, Memoria Press, recounts ... Thomas Jefferson received early training in Latin, Greek, and French from Reverend William Douglas, a Scottish clergyman. At the age of fourteen, Jefferson’s father died, and, at the express wish of his father, he continued his education with the Reverend James Maury, who ran a classical academy. After leaving Douglas’ academy, Jefferson attended the College of William and Mary, where his classical education continued along with his study of law.
When Alexander Hamilton entered King’s College (now Columbia University) in 1773, he was expected to have a mastery of Greek and Latin grammar, be able to read three orations from Cicero and Virgil’s Aeneid in the original Latin, and be able to translate the first ten chapters of the Gospel of John from Greek into Latin.
When James Madison applied at the College of New Jersey (now Princeton), he was expected to be able to “write Latin prose, translate Virgil, Cicero, and the Greek gospels and [to have] a commensurate knowledge of Latin and Greek grammar.” Even before he entered, however, he had already read Virgil, Horace, Justinian, Nepos, Caesar, Tacitus, Lucretius, Eutropius, Phaedrus, Herodotus, Thucydides, and Plato.
So, what exactly is a "classical education"? Historically, it was a course of study that was to develop exemplary citizens equipped with analytical thinking skills, virtuous character, and a passion for learning, all built upon a solid foundation of knowledge. Sadly, these characteristics are disappearing from our modern educational system; especially as our kids are being threatened with the Common Core curriculum.
Consider this op-ed in The New York Times by philosopher Justin McBrayer. He states that he already knew that many of his college-age students did not believe in moral facts. He says, "Philosophy professors with whom I have spoken suggest that the overwhelming majority of college freshman in their classrooms view moral claims as mere opinions that are not true or are true only relative to a culture"; the culture of Christianity, for instance. Subsequently, this has led to an abiding belief in moral relativism, which is a philosophy that asserts there is no global, absolute moral law that applies to all people, for all time, and in all places.
You should know that Mr. McBrayer is an associate professor of philosophy at Fort Lewis College in Durango, Colorado, where he works in ethics and philosophy of religion. So this is naturally an ideology that interests him and which he has seen often among his students. But he wasn't prepared to see its tenets being conveyed in his son's second-grade classroom! During the schools open house he "found a troubling pair of signs hanging over the bulletin board. They read:
Fact: Something that is true about a subject and can be tested or proven.
Opinion: What someone thinks, feels, or believes.
So, what's the big deal, you might ask? To cut to the chase, students are taught that claims are either facts or opinions. And Professor McBrayer says that's a dangerous road that leads to moral relativism. There are instances in which a person's opinion (or belief) is also a fact for him; his ideology can't be divided into fact OR opinion; it's both. He prove's his point in this conversation with his young son:
Father: “I believe that George Washington was the first president. Is that a fact or an opinion?”
Son: “It’s a fact.”
Father: “But I believe it, and you said that what someone believes is an opinion.”
Son: “Yeah, but it’s true.”
Father: “So it’s both a fact and an opinion?” The blank look on his son's face told the story.
Do you see where he is going with this? Can you see how the effort to separate a belief from a fact, could affect morality? Every thought (or belief) that has some kind of value attached to it, could only be an opinion, never a fact.
Now consider this Common Core worksheet, in which students were asked to label the following claims as either FACT or OPINION:
• Copying homework assignments is wrong.
• Cursing in school is inappropriate behavior.
• All men are created equal.
• It is wrong for people under 21 to drink alcohol.
• Drug dealers belong in prison.
Just take a moment and consider that our Founding Fathers were fluent in Latin and Greek, could translate Books of the Bible, and were capable of defending themselves in a spirited debate. Now realize that our public school systems are on the brink of failing our children. They can hardly spell; their reading skills are poor; they can't divide or subtract without a computer; and they are lacking important critical thinking skills. You might think that this is a different time, and the education that our Founding Fathers undertook does not relate to these times. But it was the education they received that reinforced the knowledge, the skills, and the courage they would need to create this great nation. Are we giving our kids the education to carry on their moral values and traditions, and preserve the country?
1 Timothy 4:12 "Let no one despise you for your youth, but set the believers an example in speech, in conduct, in love, in faith, in purity."