If you are unfamiliar with Agenda 21, Agenda 2030 or the Pact for the Future, don't beat yourself up. First of all, these global governmental systems are foreign to most Americans. Secondly, being developed through the United Nations, they are not designed for you to be cognizant of them, nor to have a say in their implementation. And really, to understand the genesis of these governance systems, you should begin by doing your research on Agenda 21. So, let's start there...
In June of 1992, representatives from over 178 nations gathered in Rio de Janeiro for an environmental conference to establish an environmental governance that would work on a global scale; allegedly to guide humanity on how it could further develop without wrecking the environment it depends on. Think "Green", "Climate Control" and "Sustainable Development". We've all got a pretty good idea of what the first two are all about, but what about that last one? The "official" definition of Sustainable Development is this: "development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs". That sounds like a non-threatening goal, doesn't it?
At the very least, the questions I always circle around to is how does this affect my personal freedoms and rights as a private citizen of my country? When the United Nations adopted Agenda 21 in 1992, President George Herbert Walker Bush proudly signed the document, assuring the UN Assembly that America would stand in agreement to the goals of Agenda 21 "to achieve a more efficient and equitable world economy", outlining a process to eliminate environmental decay and social injustice through micromanaging industries, communities, and culture. Does anyone else think this sounds over-reaching?
You see, Agenda 21 was broken down into four broad sections: Social and Economic dimensions [combating poverty, promoting human health, and developing sustainable human settlements]; Conservation and management of resources [protecting the atmosphere, conserving biological diversity, and managing fragile ecosystems]; Strengthening the role of major groups [soliciting groups such as NGOs, women, indigenous peoples, workers and trade unions, and the scientific community to participate with government to get the Agenda done]; and Means of Implementation [use of financial resources, technology, science, education, and international cooperation to make necessary changes that meet the Agenda's goals].
We all want clean water and clear air, the eradication of poverty, and cooperating partners, right? So what's the problem? The problem is that under the guise of world sustainability, the plan established a regime of rules that attempted to bypass Congress and the American people, handing over the power over vast areas of the US economy to unelected UN bureaucrats. Does that sound like anything we freedom-loving, believers-in-personal-liberty Americans would approve? In the ensuing years, Agenda 21, which was fortunately not legally binding, suffered from a lack of implementation. After all, a great global document is only as useful as the action it inspires.
Because the results of Agenda 21 were less than stellar, the United Nations upped their game in 2015 and transformed their global plan into Agenda 2030, in response to "the most urgent global challenges" (again listed as poverty, inequality, and climate change); this time underscoring the need for a collective approach to address all 17 of the Sustainable Development Goals of this universal Agenda. You can read about these 17 goals in an article on the website End Of The American Dream.
They spent the next ten years pushing their agenda for global management, but still struggled to gain agreement with countries that weren't quite ready to give up their national sovereignty. But in September of 2024, world leaders met at the UN Headquarters in New York City to sanction a document called the "Pact for the Future". And it looks as if they've grown impatient waiting for the world's independently governed nations to give up their power and status to the "New World Order".
In fact, the UN Pact for the Future was adopted on September 22, 2024 in general agreement by world leaders [by consensus], and represents a collective commitment from UN member states. And there are several components that are raising red flags for me .... 1) the Global Digital Compact: a framework for international cooperation in digital technology and governance; 2) A Declaration on Future Generations: A commitment to protect the rights and knowledge of future generations; and 3) Focus in the areas of Sustainable development and financing; International peace and security; Science, technology, and innovation ; Youth and future generations; and Transforming global governance .
Of course, this new plan for Global Governance is framed in language meant to assure us it is non-threatening ... it is designed to "steer humanity on a new course" and is a "landmark declaration pledging action towards an improved world for tomorrows' generations". And here is an interesting fact ... A small group of seven countries (Russia, Iran, North Korea, Belarus, Syria, and Nicaragua) opposed it based on the role of external entities having a say in their domestic affairs. They do not want outside influences dictating what they have to do inside their own borders. So, where was the United States in this opposition?
In 2024, Harbinger's Daily ran an article that highlighted some concerns that I think all of us might want to consider. According to the author of this article, the magnitude of this Pact is that it promotes a Global Digital Compact (GDC), and a Declaration on Future Generations screams of implications for our personal lives and our future! Why have we heard nothing about it? If you can read between the lines, I think we're beginning to see how this "new course" for humanity is starting to play out. For instance, one of the key elements of the GDC is to close all digital divides and "deliver an inclusive digital economy". They also want to connect all people, schools, and hospitals to the internet; this will include all our personal medical records. They want to facilitate access to information, but control misinformation and disinformation, preventing it from getting out. Sounds like government censorship to me!
Additionally, the article postulates that a panel will form a global AI policy, possibly leading to using AI to control us all globally! I don't know about you, but I'm seeing AI intrusion in all areas of our lives -- in art, in research and development, in entertainment, in the trades, in industry, etc. And, I admit I haven't figured out all the ramifications from this Pact, or the 2021 and 2030 Agendas. I just know they will not be sustaining my personal freedoms that come from God. But when I hear terms like "transforming global governance" and pledging to "promote intergenerational equity", I start thinking regulation and control over our daily lives -- in all areas.
What does that look like? It could mean ESG Scores (an objective measurement of a company or individual's performance with respect to Environmental, Social, and Governance). Are you meeting the approved criteria established for global compliance? It could mean electric vehicles, digital IDs, and a digital currency. And as far as intergenerational equity goes, I'm already hearing the Millennials and Gen Z-ers complaining that the Baby Boomers should be denied their Social Security and Medicare benefits because it's "not fair or equal" to them. That's why their Declaration on Future Generations promotes giving the younger generations more of a voice and responsibility in government. I don't want to paint a broad brush over the young people in our nation, but have you watched any of the "man on the street" interviews with these fine young citizens? They can't name the country we fought in the American Revolution, the years the Civil War were fought, when WWII ended, or who was the 16th President. Pardon me, if I'm not all that confident they will make decisions that guarantee our nation's safety, protection, or prosperity.
But here's my real fear: All of these Agendas, Pacts, and Declarations are taking place in an unobtrusive manner; largely ignored by the Mainstream Media and unrecognized by the average citizens of the world. But our kids and grandkids will be unable to reverse or negate the agreements that these global policies and actions are instituting. The UN insists that they are making way for "Global Collaboration" for among other things, Nuclear Disarmament, a framework to govern Outer Space, and regulating and affirming international and humanitarian law as it applies to new technologies.
I don't know about you, but the UN's track record in making the world a better place isn't exactly inspiring confidence. But this my spirit knows ... there is a very real commitment by the UN and its global partners to fast-track all these policies. The youth of the world are ready-made collaborators; they have grown up in the internet era and have been programmed to follow the lead of their digital creators. For the most part, the younger generations have not been taught critical thinking, and have become easily influenced and exploited. I don't know if this situation can be turned around, but I do know this ... the world -- not just America -- needs Jesus; His Justice and His Mercy. We are headed down a very dark and totalitarian path. We are about to lose our individual dignities and freedom, given by God, And I don't think we're ready for it. Pray and Seek the Lord!
Proverbs 29:2 When the righteous thrive, the people rejoice; when the wicked rule, the people groan.
