Once more, it seems as if Beth Moore has found herself the target of religious men. This time it is Reformed Baptist pastor John MacArthur who has her square in his sights. Although MacArthur lists his church as non-denominational, his doctrine of salvation is clearly founded upon Calvinist theology. [It has been my experience in a church I attended for 20 years that many Baptist churches move to a "non-denominational" designation to appeal to a wider audience]. But let me be clear, this post is not about my views on any particular belief system, but about the good Pastor's recent statements regarding the place of women [such as Beth Moore] in the the leadership of "the Church".
During a panel discussion among male preachers, MacArthur was asked his opinion about including Beth Moore as part of the Church's circle of leadership. He responded that he would tell her to "Go Home", and then followed that comment with, “There is no case that can be made biblically for a woman preacher. Period. Paragraph. End of discussion.” According to
The Christian Post, MacArthur argued that 1 Corinthians 14:34, which reads: “Women should
remain silent in the churches,” shouldn’t be “hard to understand.” “You don’t say anything,” he stressed, later adding: “Women need to get
themselves under control and realize they are not to speak in a
church.” But MacArthur wasn't through. He went on to say, “When women take over a culture, men become weak; when men become weak,
they can be conquered. When all the men have been
slaughtered, you [women] can sit there with all your jewelry and junk.
You’ve been conquered, because you overpowered your protectors.”
Okay, Pastor, I think I have presented your argument fairly. Now, let me bring another point of view to this little controversy you've stirred up. In fact, I am borrowing from a post that I originally wrote over four years ago. I still stand by it. So, let me first share another Scripture that is often used to substantiate Pastor MacArthur's position:
A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not
permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be
quiet (1 Timothy 2:11-12). By the way, although both verses in 1 Corinthians and 1 Timothy refer to women remaining silent, the latter verse is the only I could find in the Bible that refers specifically to women's authority in the Church. So, without a confirming witness, I decided to take a deeper look at
this conflict and see within what context the Apostle Paul made this
statement.
As always, I find that our English translations of the Bible leave
something to be desired when comparing them to the original Hebrew and
Greek manuscripts. Such is the case with the central word in the
argument against women leading men in instruction ... it's the word,
authority. It
seems that a study of Paul’s letters shows that he regularly used a
form of the Greek word “exousia” when referring to the use of authority
in the church. But in this particular verse, Paul used the word
"authentein". This unusual Greek verb is found only once in scripture
and rarely in extrabiblical texts, where it is usually associated with
aggression.
Authentein is translated as “domineer” in the Latin
Vulgate and New English Bible and as “usurp authority” in the Geneva and
King James Bibles.
So if Paul used the word
exousia when talking about the use of
authority in the church in 1st and 2nd Corinthians, Colossians, 2nd
Thessalonians, and Romans; why would he choose to use
authentein to refer to the same thing in 1 Timothy? Could he have been referring to something else?
This is where the context of this passage is so important! In the
case of 1 Timothy, Paul was writing a personal letter instructing
Timothy about how to deal with heresy being spread by false teachers in
Ephesus. This is spelled out at the beginning of the letter:
"As I
urged you when I went into Macedonia, stay there in Ephesus so that you
may command certain people not to teach false doctrines any longer or to
devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies…".
On the surface, there are a few things to consider when correlating this
warning with the suggestion that Paul meant women had no authority in
the church. 1) Could it be that most of the teachers of false doctrine
in Ephesus were men, and that women might have had little training in
theology; making them subject to repeating these false doctrines? It
would seem to me that Paul might have been warning the Ephesians that
any interest in these false doctrines by women might become dangerous to
the Church. If that is the case, then this warning in 1 Timothy is
specific to
that church in Ephesus, at
that time -- not meant to be a permanent restriction
on all women for all time.
2) Keeping the context of this letter and these verses in view,
remember that Paul was writing to the Church in Ephesus; a city known
for its worship of goddesses, as well as heretical Gnostic teachings.
Some of the Gnostic texts of the time sometimes described Eve as Adam’s
teacher. She is also depicted as superior to Adam, as preceding him,
and as giving life to him in some way (part of the goddess obsession).
His admonition that women should not assume authority over a man might
have been in answer to these Gnostic teachings. (The Gnostic teachings
on Eve could be what Paul is referring to in 1 Timothy 2:13-14 when he
pointedly explains that Adam is the superior one, not Eve. Reading
these verses out of context to what was going on in Ephesus gives a
completely different meaning).
3) Then there is the contradiction between other examples of
Paul's writings where he provides instructions for women praying and
prophesying in church (1 Corinthians). When Paul mentions the spiritual
gifts, he does not state that women are restricted from receiving any
of the leadership gifts. And it is interesting to note that he takes
special care to record commendations to a number of women serving in
leadership positions (Romans 16). Can we agree that Paul is generally
supportive of women’s participation, which contradicts the idea that
women must be silent?
But I keep coming back to that word
authentein. The mystery of why Paul used that particular word instead of his more common use of
exousia drove
me to dig deeper. Why did he include this passage about women and
authority in a letter that began by warning against false doctrines and
myths? As expected, the uncertainty of 1 Timothy 2:11-12, has resulted
in much historical study of the times.
 |
| The goddess Cybele and her consort, Attis |
It seems that in Timothy’s time and locale, the goddess Cybele (called
Artemis by the Greeks) was worshipped through violent rituals against
men that symbolized the murder/suicide of a false god named Attis. In
his letter to Timothy, Paul repeatedly warns against false doctrines,
mythology and extreme forms of self-denial (1 Timothy 1:3-7, 4:1-5,
6:20-21), even referring to the false teaching and related practices as
“demonic”. The violent act symbolizing the death of Attis was indeed an
extreme form of self-denial. Male priests of Cybele and Attis
renounced all sexual feeling, irrevocably, through ritual castration.
When the 5th Century Christian theologian Jerome translated 1
Timothy for the Latin translation of the Bible, he forever changed the
meaning of our contested verses. Let me explain. He translated the key
verb
authentein as "to exercise authority", and rendered it more
in terms of “having dominion over” or “dominating” a man. Prior to
Jerome's translation, the word more commonly referred to the instigation
or commission of an act of violence, suicide or murder. In the Greek
Septuagint, for example, a noun form of the word (authentas) refers to
those who engaged in ritual violence in the worship of a false god.
Are you starting to see the connection between Paul's initial
warning against false doctrines and false gods or myths, and the more
accurate interpretation of giving his prohibition against women teaching
or instigating ritual violence against men? It's all in the context of
what was going on in Ephesus! The nature of Paul’s concerns, the most
common meanings of the verb “authentein,” and the religious and cultural
context in which these verses were written are all lost in Jerome’s
Latin translation of 1 Timothy 2:12-15. Subsequent translations into
German and English followed Jerome's misleading example. Concerns about
women becoming involved in false teaching and violent rituals were
replaced with warnings against leadership and teaching roles for women
in the Church. It seems very possible that Paul's true counsel was lost
in translation!
I recognize that this new understanding I have projected is only a
theory; and I also discern that it will likely not change the 1600 years
of bias against women as having a place in the Church's ministry as
teachers
... or in the case of John MacArthur .. as preachers.
Believe
me, I am no feminist looking to usurp the leadership of men -- I am
simply trying to put forth the argument that the Lord has bestowed the
spiritual gifts of teaching and prophesying and wisdom upon women as
well as men. Why would any man deny himself the benefit of learning
from a woman whom the Lord had blessed? Certainly, Priscilla played a
major role in furthering Apollo's education on the full gospel of Jesus
(Acts 18). And then there is Phoebe, whom Paul commends in Romans 16 as a "servant of the church". I find it interesting that the word servant is translated from the Greek word,
diakonos, from which our English word
deacon comes from. At the very least, it does seem that Paul intends us to understand Phoebe as in some sense an official representative of the church at Cenchreae.
And again, it's ironic that in a time when women could not be
legal witnesses, Jesus Christ chose women as the first witnesses of His
resurrection. So, Pastor MacArthur, I believe that women can still be witnesses of His glory today, to all who
will listen. I pray that you receive divine revelation on this matter.
It seems that in Timothy’s time and locale, the goddess Cybele (called
Artemis by the Greeks) was worshipped through violent rituals against
men that symbolized the murder/suicide of a false god named Attis. In
his letter to Timothy, Paul repeatedly warns against false doctrines,
mythology and extreme forms of self-denial (1 Timothy 1:3-7, 4:1-5,
6:20-21), even referring to the false teaching and related practices as
“demonic”. The violent act symbolizing the death of Attis was indeed an
extreme form of self-denial. Male priests of Cybele and Attis
renounced all sexual feeling, irrevocably, through ritual castration.
For a more comprehensive look at the ancient Gnostic teachings, false
doctrines, and translation errors that contributed to our confused
understanding of 1 Timothy 2, please click here. My thanks to Bob Edwards for his outstanding research and commentary.
Acts 2:17-18 And it shall come
to pass in the last days, God declares, that I will pour out of My
Spirit upon all mankind, and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy
[telling forth the divine counsels] and your young men shall see
visions (divinely granted appearances), and your old men shall dream
[divinely suggested] dreams. Yes,
and on My menservants also, and on My maidservants, in those days I
will pour out of My Spirit, and they shall prophesy [telling forth the
divine counsels and predicting future events pertaining especially to
God’s kingdom].
